*WELCOME TO THE CRAZY WORLD OF GM AND BIOFUELS

Or how to profit out of a crisis you yourself created

QUESTION: Who kicked off the "biofuels" boom that's triggered soaring food
prices and a whole host of other unintended consequences?

ANSWER: George W. Bush.

QUESTION: Who lobbied for this disastrous policy?

ANSWER: Big agribiz, the biotech industry, big oil and the motor industry.

QUESTION: Who have been the principal beneficiaries of this disastrous
policy?

ANSWER: Big agribiz and Monsanto.

QUESTION: Who warned against such a policy and predicted the consequences?

ANSWER: Many in the environmental movement. GM Watch started publishing
warnings about the dangers of the GM industry's promotion of so called "biofuels"
as far back as 2005. Groups like Friends of the Earth warned about the
dangers of biofuels right from the start.

CONCLUSION?

The obvious conclusion that governments should be drawing from the
"biofuels" debacle is that there are very grave dangers in being swept away by
industry lobbying and adopting policies based on hyperbole about simplistic
technofixes *ahead of the evidence*. This has very clear implications for GM.

BUT pro-GMers are trying to exploit the current crisis to argue exactly the
opposite by totally inverting the truth.

THE CRAZY WORLD OF THE GM PROMOTERS

QUESTION: Who's responsible for the "biofuels" fiasco?

ANSWER: "The greens" who "joined forces" with George Bush to create a food
shortage that today threatens millions in poor countries with hunger and
starvation."

QUESTION: Who paved the way for this disastrous policy?

ANSWER: "The greens" who "demonized the consumption of petroleum and
genetically modified foods, and crusaded against carbon". (Both Bush and Greens Fuel
Food Shortage)
_http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/swaminathan_aiyar/2008/04/both_
bush_and_greens_fuel_food.html_
(http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/swaminathan_aiyar/2008/04/both_bush_and_greens_fuel_food.html)

QUESTION: How do we deal with this disaster?

ANSWER: GM is "the swiftest path to higher productivity" and solving the
problems of hunger andf starvation. (The cost of green tinkering is hunger and
starvation)
_http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/apr/16/biofuels.alternativeenerg
y_
(http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/apr/16/biofuels.alternativeenergy)

CONCLUSION: "Environmentalists are now the biggest threat to the environment
and the hungry."

COMMENT: The quotes above may be particularly extreme but there are a
disturbing number of opinion pieces appearing that attempt to associate "biofuels"
(read: agrofuels) with environmentalism, and/or hail biotech as the solution
to all possible crisies - based on unsubstantiated claims that GM crops
increase productivity, provide drought-resistance and can solve a myriad of other
problems.

The current crisis atmosphere, in other words, seems to be actually boosting
the promotion of policies based on hyperbole about simplistic technofixes
ahead of the evidence.

If so, those who stand to gain most from this mess could be the very people
who created it.